Hur kommer Obama att styra?
Bill O'Reilly är en konservativ, vänster-hatande programledare på det amerikanska bolaget Fox News (Ni vet, "Fair and balanced" - NOT!). Jag läste hans senaste krönika om hur vi faktiskt inte vet någonting om hur Obama kommer att leda USA. Ska vi låta hans krönika bli offer för våra samhällskritiska ögon?
By Bill O'Reilly for BillOReilly.com Thursday, November 6, 2008
The fascinating thing about Barack Obama's election is that few Americans seem to know exactly how the man is going to govern. Is he going to be a Nancy Pelosi enthusiast, a far-left guy? Or will he move to the center like President Clinton did? Even his devoted followers don't really know how the man will initially use his power.
There's an old country saying: "You dance with the one who brung ya." Just hours after Obama's victory, the far left MoveOn.org outfit issued a press release saying that, during the campaign, it had raised an astounding $88 million on behalf of the president-elect. The timing of MoveOn's statement was no accident: It was a subtle reminder that payback is expected.
For far-left zealots, the goal is a European-like entitlement culture where the feds provide direct assistance to those not having a lot of money. In places like France and Sweden, there are no demands placed upon those receiving government money; cradle-to-grave financial support is simply given to anyone earning under a certain amount. So, if you want to gamble all day long or drink vodka until your legs give out, fine—you still get the check, the housing, the medical care.
Traditionally, Americans have rejected that kind of nanny state, but make no mistake, that is what the far left sees as "economic justice."
And then there are "San Francisco values." That is the George Soros vision of legalized narcotics and prostitution, unfettered abortion rights, legalized euthanasia, and gay marriage, to name just a few social issues. Soros, a big time contributor to MoveOn, believes America should be a libertine society where moral judgments about social behavior are unacceptable.
So, where will Barack Obama be on those issues? He says he personally opposes gay marriage, but I can't imagine him working against it. He's also fine with abortion in cases where the health of the mother is an issue. Of course, the health of the mother could be a panic attack or a headache. Based upon his voting record in the past, I expect Obama to be extremely liberal when social legislation is presented to him. I also expect Ruth Bader Ginsburg to have a new best friend if a Supreme Court opening occurs.
However, if Obama tacks to the left on entitlements and the controversial social stuff, his appeal to working Americans might quickly diminish... especially if the economy doesn't turn around. Even while Obama was winning liberal California, voters were overturning the gay marriage law imposed upon them by activist judges. The United States is still a center-right country when it comes to traditional values.
I believe Obama and his advisors understand that. But I am also sure that the MoveOn brigades and devoted liberal media outlets are hungry for more "progressive" change. This is a real dicey situation for the newly elected President. The words "rock" and "hard place" come to mind.
"In places like France and Sweden, there are no demands placed upon those receiving government money [...]", "So, if you want to gamble all day long or drink vodka until your legs give out, fine—you still get the check, the housing, the medical care."
Han verkar ha ganska dålig koll på exakt HUR mycket man får i bidrag. Vad jag vet så ligger bidragen på så lite pengar att man kanske inte ens kan betala för sitt boende. Visserligen finns här mycket att kritisera, vi vill ju att personer som verkligen behöver hjälp skall få den så att pengarna inte hamnar hos personer som missbrukar dem. Det är också att han inte vill att pengar ska hamna hos personer som vill "gamble all day long or drink vodka until your legs give out", då han förespråkar så fri marknad som möjligt vilket har resulterat i att flera av USA:s banker har lånat ut pengar till personer och familjer som inte kan betala tillbaka det.
"He's (Barack Obama) also fine with abortion in cases where the health of the mother is an issue. Of course, the health of the mother could be a panic attack or a headache."
Sätter han också kaninöron runt "kvinnans hälsa" som John McCain också gjorde i en debatt? ASSHOLE!
Nä, nu blir jag bara så sur
Puss och kram/// Er wannabe-Jon Stewart och wannabe-kulturtant Karin
By Bill O'Reilly for BillOReilly.com Thursday, November 6, 2008
The fascinating thing about Barack Obama's election is that few Americans seem to know exactly how the man is going to govern. Is he going to be a Nancy Pelosi enthusiast, a far-left guy? Or will he move to the center like President Clinton did? Even his devoted followers don't really know how the man will initially use his power.
There's an old country saying: "You dance with the one who brung ya." Just hours after Obama's victory, the far left MoveOn.org outfit issued a press release saying that, during the campaign, it had raised an astounding $88 million on behalf of the president-elect. The timing of MoveOn's statement was no accident: It was a subtle reminder that payback is expected.
For far-left zealots, the goal is a European-like entitlement culture where the feds provide direct assistance to those not having a lot of money. In places like France and Sweden, there are no demands placed upon those receiving government money; cradle-to-grave financial support is simply given to anyone earning under a certain amount. So, if you want to gamble all day long or drink vodka until your legs give out, fine—you still get the check, the housing, the medical care.
Traditionally, Americans have rejected that kind of nanny state, but make no mistake, that is what the far left sees as "economic justice."
And then there are "San Francisco values." That is the George Soros vision of legalized narcotics and prostitution, unfettered abortion rights, legalized euthanasia, and gay marriage, to name just a few social issues. Soros, a big time contributor to MoveOn, believes America should be a libertine society where moral judgments about social behavior are unacceptable.
So, where will Barack Obama be on those issues? He says he personally opposes gay marriage, but I can't imagine him working against it. He's also fine with abortion in cases where the health of the mother is an issue. Of course, the health of the mother could be a panic attack or a headache. Based upon his voting record in the past, I expect Obama to be extremely liberal when social legislation is presented to him. I also expect Ruth Bader Ginsburg to have a new best friend if a Supreme Court opening occurs.
However, if Obama tacks to the left on entitlements and the controversial social stuff, his appeal to working Americans might quickly diminish... especially if the economy doesn't turn around. Even while Obama was winning liberal California, voters were overturning the gay marriage law imposed upon them by activist judges. The United States is still a center-right country when it comes to traditional values.
I believe Obama and his advisors understand that. But I am also sure that the MoveOn brigades and devoted liberal media outlets are hungry for more "progressive" change. This is a real dicey situation for the newly elected President. The words "rock" and "hard place" come to mind.
"In places like France and Sweden, there are no demands placed upon those receiving government money [...]", "So, if you want to gamble all day long or drink vodka until your legs give out, fine—you still get the check, the housing, the medical care."
Han verkar ha ganska dålig koll på exakt HUR mycket man får i bidrag. Vad jag vet så ligger bidragen på så lite pengar att man kanske inte ens kan betala för sitt boende. Visserligen finns här mycket att kritisera, vi vill ju att personer som verkligen behöver hjälp skall få den så att pengarna inte hamnar hos personer som missbrukar dem. Det är också att han inte vill att pengar ska hamna hos personer som vill "gamble all day long or drink vodka until your legs give out", då han förespråkar så fri marknad som möjligt vilket har resulterat i att flera av USA:s banker har lånat ut pengar till personer och familjer som inte kan betala tillbaka det.
"He's (Barack Obama) also fine with abortion in cases where the health of the mother is an issue. Of course, the health of the mother could be a panic attack or a headache."
Sätter han också kaninöron runt "kvinnans hälsa" som John McCain också gjorde i en debatt? ASSHOLE!
Nä, nu blir jag bara så sur
Puss och kram/// Er wannabe-Jon Stewart och wannabe-kulturtant Karin
Tyck till!
Postat av: Emi
"ASSHOLE!"
Postat av: Anonym
varför lägger du skulden på bankerna? var tror du dom fick pengarna att låna ut till socialfall från?
Postat av: Karin
Jag lägger inte skulden på bankerna, är inte tillräckligt med ekonom för att veta vem/vilka som äger hela skulden i detta fallet. Det är i vilket fall inte relevant för mitt argument. Det relevanta är att Bill O'Reilly förespråkar detta system som orsakat denna finansiella kris, men tycker ändå att det är absurt att ge bidrag till socialfall.
Trackback